A 17-year-old at one of Singapore's
strict Catholic all-boys secondary schools
demonstrates -- from recent personal experience, he
says -- the stance students must adopt (after
emptying their back pockets) when being routinely
disciplined in the office: hands holding on to the
seat of a chair, feet braced wide apart for stability
and balance, legs locked straight, posterior pushed a
little up and back.
In this position,
the trousers should be just slightly taut over the
seat but not stretched too tight, presenting a safe,
steady, well-defined target for the DM to cane as
hard as he can, without fear of doing the boy any
indicate that such office canings -- often of just a
single powerful stroke -- play a substantial role in
this particular school's behaviour management
strategy, with the full approval of the Parents
schools seem to be popular with parents who seek an
especially firmly structured setting for their sons'
The following description of the current
situation is derived partly from a variety of published
materials and partly from information provided privately by
local teachers and students.
British-style formal caning (for male students
only) is fully lawful as a punishment in Singapore schools
and strongly supported by the government. Now that school
corporal punishment has been completely abolished in the UK
and most of its other former outposts, Singapore is probably
the country where English school caning traditions are still
most faithfully upheld. The great majority of the country's
150+ secondary schools use the cane, and at many of them it
is a significant element in the disciplinary system.
It is important to be clear that
this is something different from the (much more severe) judicial
canings -- ordered by the courts, and inflicted in prison,
mostly on adult men -- for which Singapore is much better
The Singapore education system is stunningly successful. The country comes at or very close to the top in international comparisons of maths, science and reading achievement (see External links below). It would be absurd to suggest that this is because of corporal punishment: other Asian countries which no longer use it are also high up the lists. But it does show that the use of CP is no barrier to excellence in education, as some would have us believe.
Singapore seems to be the only
English-speaking country outside the USA where a significant number of
schools state in their own literature or websites that they
officially use corporal punishment, as in these examples. However, some schools do not mention punishment
at all on their websites -- also as in the USA. Anecdotal
evidence suggests that some of the schools using caning most
frequently are among those which say nothing about discipline
on their websites.
Three secondary schools formerly stated publicly that they did not use CP. One of them has recently closed down, and the other two have reversed their policy and now use the cane.
Corporal punishment in government schools is strictly regulated by the Ministry of Education. Details of every caning have to be keyed into the Ministry's computer database. It is to be administered by the principal or under his or her express authority, and with another teacher as witness.
Under Ministry rules, there is a
maximum of six strokes per caning. In practice, the majority
of canings are of either one, two or three hard strokes
across the seat of a boy's school uniform trousers or shorts,
typically delivered by a specially designated and trained
"Discipline Master" (for whom this skilled task is a recognised part of his job description), using a big flexible "light rattan" cane, with the miscreant bending over a desk or chair. Ministry regulations also permit caning on the hands, but in practice this is rare, at any rate at secondary level.
"Light" is a relative
term and, while the school cane is certainly not as heavy and
thick as the Singapore judicial cane, photographs show that
it is almost as long -- at least one metre long.
Although no official statistics appear to be available,
anecdotal mentions of canings crop up in newspaper articles,
websites and message boards, as well as in conversations with
teachers and students, sufficiently often to confirm that
they occur quite frequently in many, but not all, Singapore
schools -- certainly in most boys' schools, but also for boys
in the majority of mixed-sex schools.
Singapore has some 160 secondary schools. These are for pupils aged between 12 and 18, although the majority move on to college by age 17. Fifteen of these schools are for girls only and thus irrelevant for our purposes here, since girls may not be caned. There are 12 boys-only schools, several of which are run by various Christian denominations; informed sources suggest that some of these make fairly extensive use of caning. Well-known examples are St Patrick's and St Gabriel's (Catholic) and St Andrew's (Anglican). The boys-only schools also include some "top" or "elite" academic schools such as Victoria School, Hwa Chong Institution, Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) and, most famously, Raffles Institution, sometimes described as the "Eton of Singapore". All these, too, use the cane at least occasionally.
But it is the 130 or so mixed-sex state schools that form the backbone of the secondary education system. Most of these are mainstream, neighbourhood schools in the country's working-class tower-block heartland, areas rarely seen by the tourists who throng Orchard Road or Boat Quay. They vary considerably in their use of caning.
Most CP is meted out privately in the school office, usually with the principal or vice-principal in attendance. The aim in these cases is simply to show the boy that bad deeds have unpleasant consequences, and that he must take responsibility for his
actions, and to supply him with the pain he needs to induce a change of attitude or behaviour.
Schools vary a lot in their attitudes towards parental involvement. Some state uncompromisingly that misbehaving boys will be caned "with or without their parents' consent". The only legal requirement is that they be informed afterwards. At other schools, parents will sometimes have been consulted by phone beforehand, or even summoned to the school in person
to discuss their son's offence and how to respond to it, but
they are not invited to be present at the actual punishment.
The final decision to cane rests legally with the
Principal; but in practice there may be a collective decision
by a School Disciplinary Committee, on which the Principal
might be joined by the Vice-Principal and the DM(s) and
counsellor(s) and probably one or two of the boy's class teachers.
It rarely takes place
immediately after the commission of the offence, and
certainly not in anger. This careful, calm "due
process" approach, together with the hushed solemnity of
the infliction itself, gives the whole procedure an
altogether different flavour from the sort of slapdash,
casual, unregulated, spur-of-the-moment and often
bad-tempered use of canes or sticks that is frequently
reported in schools in, for instance, the Indian sub-continent, and
also referred to, misleadingly in my view, as "corporal
One criticism of this kind of
consultative decision-making is that it all takes time,
meaning that several days, or even weeks, might elapse
between the offence and the consequence. Some Principals, no
doubt taking the view that punishment is most efficacious if
it follows on rather swiftly from the wrongdoing, prefer to
act more autocratically.
By their nature, private office canings do not become known to the general public except in exceptional circumstances. One such exceptional case
took place in May 2011 at the aforementioned St Andrew's Secondary, where the cane is known anecdotally to be in regular use. The press report describes an entirely routine and unremarkable caning of two boys there -- one stroke each on the buttocks in the Discipline Master's office. Only the unusual nature of the offence -- a public spat on Facebook in which threatening language was used -- explains why this particular punishment got into the papers.
Sometimes it is decided that the
student must receive his punishment, more ceremoniously, in a
classroom in front of his classmates, as in this video clip. This,
generally known as a "class caning", adds a dash of
embarrassment to the recipe, and also serves pour
encourager les autres. "Class canings" are not
to be confused with instant punishment by the class teacher,
which is not allowed. Ordinary class teachers are not
nowadays permitted to use CP, and this rule is actively
enforced by the government. Anecdotal evidence suggests that
this was not always the case until perhaps the 1980s.
Perhaps uniquely for a first-world
country in the 21st century, there are some schools where the
punishment ceremony may even, in the most serious or
recalcitrant cases, be carried out before an assembly of
the whole school, girls as well as boys -- an audience in
many instances of some 1,500.
These salutary and humbling "public
canings" (so-called -- they are not of course open
to the general public), pictured below left, are a
regular feature of life at a number of schools, where there
might be several such occasions per year, sometimes involving
as many as half a dozen boys being dealt with in succession
at the one ceremony. In some cases, each offender has to read
out a pre-agreed "public apology" from the stage
just before taking up his position across the punishment desk.
After the strokes have been administered, he may have to remain on stage while the Principal harangues the school about his misdemeanours. Where the school is a Christian one (of which there are perhaps 20, not counting several all-girls ones), there may also be a
short blessing of the proceedings by the Chaplain.
An example was reported in the press in this Sep 2005 case at an unnamed "top boys' school" (swiftly identified in local message boards as Raffles Institution), and this Oct 2004 case at Bowen Secondary, in which three 17-year-old boys were caned in public after the Head Prefect failed to persuade the principal that private canings would suffice.
This June 1999 case, where six
senior students together received two strokes each on their buttocks with a "thick and long" cane in front of the assembled school at Pioneer Secondary, was unusual, both in that one of the boys is named, and in that his parents made a rare public protest about it. Interestingly, this was
claimed to be the first public caning at the school in five years. One may assume that the few cases that get into the newspapers are, by definition, likely to be untypical. Several other schools are known to mete out public canings very much more often than that, without any press attention.
Public caning is unlikely to happen to a boy who has not already undergone office canings and class canings on previous occasions. It universalises the deterrent effect of the punishment for other students, with a dramatic illustration that there are clear limits to what is behaviourally acceptable. And it maximises retribution for the offender in the form of shame as well as pain.
Scenes from a typical "public caning" session, one of several held at this co-educational
neighbourhood school in July 2008. Three 15/16-year-olds had to undergo two strokes each in
front of over 1,000 girls and boys. They had been found smoking in the school toilets.
Here, one of the culprits (in white shirt and dark trousers) has been made to bend at almost 90 degrees over a desk or chair placed specially on the stage. He will have his elbows on the desk, or his hands on the seat of the chair, with his head well down, so that his upper back is near horizontal. He will already be suffering at this point, having received his first stroke, and now awaits the second.
At this school, the custom is for the boy being punished to have his bottom pointing at the audience so they are obliged to watch the cane landing. (At many other schools, the offender faces the assembly, as in these video clips -- which may be more embarrassing for him, as the audience will see all his involuntary facial expressions.)
The Discipline Master ("DM"), on the left, takes careful
aim. If you look closely (just above the right ear of the audience member partly obscuring the view) you can see that he is positioning the business end of the cane horizontally across the centre of the bending boy's behind, with its tip reaching exactly as far as the right-hand side of the far buttock.
The teacher glimpsed on the right is assisting the operation by preparing each offender in turn for punishment: helping him to bend over properly, checking there are no extra pairs of underwear, smoothing the trouser cloth snugly over the whole target area to ensure that there are no folds or rucks to impede the cane's impact, and fixing a magazine over the small of the back to protect the spine.
The Singapore secondary school cane is big - about one metre long. The longer the cane,
the sharper the pain, but also the more skill and expertise it takes to control it accurately. DMs get special training from the Ministry of Education, and regular practice. Above, the DM pulls the cane back and up, ready for the next stroke.
This particular DM believes in wasting no time between strokes. Others prefer to give the student time to recover his composure after each one.
One or two DMs (at any rate for office canings - probably not at the more solemn ritual of the public caning) even allow the young man to jump up and down rubbing the affected part before bending over again for the next stroke.
The camera captures the cane in mid-descent. The DM has his left arm outstretched for balance, hidden from view in this shot. This DM's acrobatics are quite sedate: some go through all sorts of martial-arts-type moves as they make their approach.
The rattan is moving too fast to be caught on camera
as it swishes through the last part of its trajectory
and smacks resoundingly into the waiting student's
rear end (the sheer volume of the sound always takes
novice onlookers by surprise). The impressive amount
of vigour and energy the DM puts into wielding it can
be seen from his posture in these successive frames.
generally prefer to administer a small number of
strokes at the DM's maximum power, rather than a
larger number of milder ones. This reduces the chance
of the lad's "tramlines" overlapping, which
can cause superficial bleeding.
His two strokes duly received, the student will now
be in some pain. He has been helped up and is turning
to his left to move aside, making way for the next
wrongdoer (out of picture on the right) to come
forward and go over the punishment desk.
At left, the
school's lady Principal watches the proceedings. She
will have been the key figure in deciding to hold
this disciplinary session in front of the whole
school, and will have agreed with the DM how many
strokes to give each boy. She will probably make a
speech to the assembled company -- in this case, no
doubt, about the evils of tobacco use -- once all the
day's canings have been inflicted.
There can be intermediate levels
between a "class caning" and a "public caning". Some schools give these special names, such as
"a cohort caning" (in front of all classes of the
offending pupil's year) and "a consortium caning"
(in front of all the lower secondary, or all the upper
secondary, or certain streams of classes within certain year levels).
The handful of boys-only
secondary schools tend, by all accounts, to be even
stricter than the mainstream mixed-sex schools. Office
canings at some of them are, with parental support, said to
be a more or less a daily event (see box above right),
routinely imposed for things that in most schools would
attract only a detention, like latecoming, forgetting books,
or wearing the wrong colour of socks.
At the more mainstream schools,
however, the offences most often punished corporally
are smoking, fighting/bullying, truancy and defiance. Other
activities likely to result in a caning include vandalism,
cheating and stealing.
Of these, smoking is perhaps the
single most common misdemeanour. Many schools cane
automatically for it, and this includes smoking anywhere in
Singapore in school uniform, as well as at school. Smoking
under the age of 18, in or out of uniform, is actually a criminal offence,
and when the police pick up such a malefactor they will
inform his school as a matter of course. Students in these
cases are also reported to the Health Sciences Authority, which can require them to enrol on a
compulsory stop-smoking course or else pay a large fine, as
well as being caned at school if they were in uniform at the
Quite a few schools also operate a
merit/demerit points system for lesser offences, under which
a boy will automatically be invited to call in at the office
to receive corporal discipline upon reaching a specified number of
demerits. These policies are sometimes set out in detail in school handbooks.
Students undergoing corporal punishment at secondary schools may be aged anything from 12 to 18 inclusive. 18 is rare, simply because most students have left by then. 17 is not uncommon, as we shall see. But the great majority of canings are of boys
aged 14, 15 and 16.
In some cases CP is combined with
suspension, typically for a week. If the culprit is lucky, he
is allowed to take his caning before going home to start his
suspension. If not, he will be caned on the morning of his
return to school, so he has all week to "look
forward" to his impending ordeal.
From accounts by students who have
been caned, it appears that the recipient typically suffers moderate
to acute pain for a few minutes, depending above all on
the number of strokes received. This soon gives way to a less
intense stinging and itching sensation around the points of
impact, together with a more generalised aching or soreness
which usually lasts for at least several hours, during which
time sitting down is likely to be uncomfortable.
Across the young man's buttocks
will appear neat horizontal weals or "tramlines",
one set for each stroke received, lasting for some days, and
he may also be bruised for a week or more. These effects are
only superficial: the "light rattan" will not cut
deep into the flesh in the way that the much heavier judicial
In the hope of saving face, most
boys try not to give vocal expression to their pain when the
cane makes contact; but many fail in this endeavour.
According to experienced insiders, a wordless, semi-stifled
yelp or groan is most often heard, as in the video clip
mentioned above. (It is only in comic
fiction that schoolboys say "ouch!" or
"yaroo!" when being caned.)
Rapid gasps of breath and
watery eyes are also normal during the actual infliction
and for a couple of minutes afterwards. Actual weeping is
fairly rare, Singapore being very much a "big boys don't
cry" kind of society. Especially at a public caning,
feigning nonchalance ("act brave", in the local
slang) is de rigueur.
Different schools have different
detailed policies. One or two make the offender change into
PE kit for his caning. Many DMs take either an elaborate
run-up, a "flying leap", or a kind of twirling
dance, as they administer each stroke. Some will pull the
boy's shirt out of his trousers before bending him over. Some
schools designate a muscular young PE teacher as the DM (an
echo of some US practice). At one or two schools, the
Principal (or Vice-Principal, if the Principal is a lady)
takes on the role of DM himself. Conversely, some huge
schools have so much discipline business to conduct that they
have two full-time DMs, who might share out the caning work
between them. Some conduct public canings outdoors on the
parade square, others inside in the hall.
Many schools protect the culprit's
spine with a cushion, or a book, or a document file, or a
slab of cardboard, or a special wide leather belt, placed
just above the target area, though this really isn't
necessary if a proper position is assumed, and is done
primarily, I think, for dramatic effect. Where several
strokes have to be administered, some DMs deliver them all in
brisk succession, others wait after each one until the boy
signals that he feels able to take the next one. At least one
school, where a group of students are receiving a number of
strokes each, will give one stroke to each boy in turn and
then start again with the second stroke for each boy, and so
on. Some schools cane in the corridor outside the classroom
rather than inside the room. One or two have been known to
let boys negotiate on an ad hoc basis for a cane stroke in
lieu of multiple detentions, though in general there is
absolutely no tradition of "choosing your
punishment" as in some US paddling schools. Many schools
require the student to receive counselling before and/or
after his caning (this is a Ministry of Education
recommendation). And so on and on.
Broadly speaking, though, the
whole process is rather similar to much pre-1998 experience
in the UK, especially at English boys' secondary schools up
to the 1970s. This is probably because of a strong British
input to the education system while Singapore was
developing rapidly in the 1950s and 1960s. Also, modern
Singapore's founding father, Lee Kwan Yew, made explicit
his approval of corporal punishment -- specifically,
English-style caning applied vigorously to the backside -- as
being much the best way of disciplining errant schoolboys.(1)
(He also introduced similar procedures for disobedient teenage military conscripts.)
Many primary schools in
Singapore also sometimes provide CP for boys who need it, but
rather less severely and with a smaller cane.
Colleges, the equivalent of British 6th-form colleges, at
which students are normally aged 16+ to 19, do not appear to
feature CP in their schedules of penalties, as far as can be
ascertained, though there is no legal reason why they should
not (full adulthood is not reached until age 21 in
Singapore); and at least one is on the public record as
having used caning in the past(2). Thus, if a boy
moves on to Junior College shortly before he is 17, he is
probably free of the risk of a caning, whereas his
contemporary who stays on at secondary school for at least
one more year in "secondary 5" -- typically to take
GCE 'O' levels after being in a slower stream -- remains
subject to it.
This possibility for "senior
canings" is by no means a dead letter. For instance, one
school caned no fewer than five 17-year-olds at one go in
April 2008, according to informed sources. All five had been
playing truant, and were required to take turns to bend over
for two serious strokes each in front of their mixed-sex
secondary 5 class -- highly embarrassing as well as painful.
Recent cases at other schools are known to have involved
three-stroke office canings of students aged just under 18,
for fighting and gambling. The only viable alternative
punishment for such serious offences -- suspension -- would
be a disaster for students preparing for their crucial
last-chance final exams.
Back to those Ministry rules: no
implement other than a cane may be used, and ordinary classroom
teachers are not allowed to use CP of any kind: even
spanking with the open hand is absolutely forbidden. This
helps to ensure that CP is never administered in anger and
does not degenerate into a casual, on-the-spot penalty for
low-level misbehaviour in class, but is instead considered by
the school's senior management in each case, is delivered
safely and accurately by a dispassionate expert, and is --
with a few exceptions, notably some of the boys-only schools
-- generally reserved for relatively major transgressions.
It is clear, though, that caning
is far from being a "last resort" (to use
the silly phrase that came to bedevil the question of school
CP in Britain), even though at least one official source
claims that it is. At most Singapore schools the cane tends
to come after detention, but before suspension, in the
hierarchy of penalties -- although, as noted earlier, it is
also quite common for caning and suspension, or caning and
detention, to be combined. The actual last resort, of course, is expulsion.
Yet there is at least one school,
well known for its strictness, where if a boy has to be
expelled he is actually publicly caned as well, in
some cases deploying the rarely-invoked legal maximum of six
strokes -- a severe punishment indeed. One wonders why the
student in such a case agrees to turn up and submit to this,
since he is being kicked out of the school anyway. But they
do. Perhaps it is made a condition of not turning the matter
over to the police.
Occasionally the suggestion is
raised in the public prints that CP be extended to girl
students, who are seen in some quarters as getting out of
hand. Teachers' representatives have backed this idea in the past (see External links, below). But the government has firmly resisted it, pointing out that serious offences by girls are a small fraction of the total. In any case, the idea
doesn't ring true with most people at an emotional level,
because corporal punishment, and particularly caning on the
buttocks, has always been seen throughout the British world
as overwhelmingly "a guy thing", as well as being
arguably unsuited to the female physiology. And Singapore
schoolboys themselves, in my experience, are among the last
people to challenge the notion that males and females are
different species. It does not seem to strike them as unfair
that they might be caned while girls never will be. This is
all of a piece with, for instance, the fact that all male
Singaporeans, but no women, have to perform military service.
"Public caning" is noticeably more controversial
in local opinion than corporal punishment per se. In
particular, in some
quarters there is a concern that it can be upsetting for
younger girls to have to witness it. One or two schools do
allow girls to leave the hall before the caning begins, if
they wish, according to informed sources.
But there is no evidence of any
pressure to abolish the cane altogether. The opposition
parties say they favour retaining it. It makes a good fit
with Singapore's highly "masculine" vision of
itself as a brave, tough, resilient, militarised society,
much as Britain used to be but is no longer. There seems to
be wide acceptance that caning is a fair and effective
penalty, particularly for wayward schoolboys in the middle
teens, and helps to maintain the enviably high levels of
school discipline and educational achievement on which
visitors to Singapore invariably remark.
(1) See e.g. his autobiography, the relevant section of which you can read here. He described his own caning at Raffles Institution in the 1930s; it is still, by general consent, the country's top elite school, and its traditions continue.
(2) Anglo-Chinese Junior College (ACJC), in the 1980s. See Chee Keng Lim, in Development of Education in Singapore, National Archives of Singapore No 1425. See also this Feb 1987 news item on an incident that resulted in seven ACJC students being caned.
Regulation No 88 under the Schools Regulation Act 1957
School Principals' Handbook, Section 19.3 - Corporal punishment
EXTERNAL LINKS: (these will open in a new window)
Care and Control: On the Relationship between Discipline and Counselling in Education
National University of Singapore paper (2002) explains that discipline, including corporal punishment, is not incompatible with school counselling: rather, the two complement each other. "Both are motivated by care and concern for the well-being of the recipient." Indeed, it is recommended that caning be followed up with counselling, to clear the air and help the punished student reflect upon his misbehaviour.
International Student Achievement in Reading [PDF]
International Student Achievement in Mathematics [PDF]
International Student Achievement in Science [PDF]
World-scale objective documentation of different countries' educational achievements, showing that Singapore is doing much better than most countries on the key indicators. This makes nonsense of claims by anti-CP campaigners that the use of corporal punishment somehow runs counter to school success. Clearly there is no relationship at all between the two things. It is the quality of the teaching that matters.
Disciplinary Efforts in Schools
This 2005 official note does not mention CP specifically, but states that since 1999 Singapore schools have had Operations Managers (OMs), who are former police or army officers, to assist Discipline Masters (DMs) in maintaining discipline. Both OMs and DMs get special skills training from the Ministry of Education. See also these May 1999 news items.
Discipline in School
Statement (2005) by the Singapore Teachers' Union. They were concerned about indiscipline by girls, who by law cannot be caned, and asked either that that law be changed or that some other steps be taken to deal effectively with defiant and disruptive female students.
Speech by the Education Minister, May 2004
The Minister noted (para 14) that school discipline in Singapore was not getting worse, and indeed that fewer serious school offences were being recorded than 15 years earlier. He was confident that discipline was far better in Singapore than in most other countries (this is almost certainly true, on any conceivable measure). And he pointed out rather undiplomatically that, not only in Western countries but even in Japan and Hong Kong (countries where school CP is no longer used), violent bullying was rampant in schools, which was not widely the case in Singapore. Although he did not spell this out in words of one syllable, one can read the intended message: countries that have abolished CP have much worse school discipline. At para 16 he made it clear that the government was committed to maintaining high standards of discipline and that it had no plans to change the present rules that allow school principals discretion to use the cane.
More photographs of Singapore school canings in Picture Parade
Video clips of Singapore school canings
Current Singapore school handbooks
Other external links for Singapore/School CP