Corpun file 18910
Tuscaloosa News, Alabama, 4 February 2007
Child spanking is discipline, not a form of abuse
By Gary Palmer
If a California assemblywoman has her way, it may soon be
illegal for parents to spank their children. Correspondingly, if
parents are caught spanking their toddlers and convicted they
could serve up to a year in prison.
Democrat Sally Lieber, an assemblywoman from the San Francisco
area, is proposing a bill that would outlaw spanking children
under the age of 4. Lieber said the bill would be broadly written
to include all forms of corporal punishment. Some legal experts
are recommending that the bill be modeled after European laws
that require first- and second-time offenders to attend parenting
education classes. Presumably, third-time offenders would be sent
to the government gulag for habitual spankers; call it
"three swats and you're out."
Even the reliably liberal Los Angeles Times thinks Lieber's
bill is an absurd idea. In a Jan. 23 editorial, the Times editors
wrote that spanking a child is obviously less harmful than
separating the child from its parents by hauling them off to
Lieber, who has a cat but no children of her own, considers
spanking to be the same as beating and it victimizes helpless
children. Lieber justifies introducing the bill because she
believes spanking breeds violence in society. Plus, her
veterinarian told her to never hit her cat.
Lieber got the idea for the ban from Thomas Nazario, a family
friend and law professor at the University of San Francisco.
Nazario says there is no rational reason for allowing parents the
legal right to strike their helpless children when the law does
not allow them to strike an adult.
Nanny-state liberals are hailing Lieber's effort and rallying
to her side with equally inane analogies including comparing
spanking to wife beating. Nadine Block, director of the Center
for Effective Discipline and co-chair of the Ohio-based End
Physical Punishment of Children, believes ending spanking is a
"children's rights" issue. In an online Time Magazine
article, Block said, "Today, we can't hit slaves, wives or
military personnel. Children are the only class
Aside from the fact that the "slaves" analogy is
completely far-fetched, Block's comment does illuminate the real
agenda of many of those who oppose spanking; it is really about
giving children legal rights against their parents.
First of all, spanking is not a children's rights issue, it is
a parent's responsibility issue. It is every parent's
responsibility to discipline their children appropriately,
including administering corporal punishment in a constructive,
While Lieber views the use of physical punishment as a
privilege that parents will have to give up, the choice to spank
is not a privilege or something most parents even want to do.
Rather, it is a means of discipline that many, if not most,
parents would prefer to avoid.
It is also a misrepresentation to equate spanking with abuse
or generalize about it as a cause of youth violence and other
high-risk behavior. Lieber and many other nanny-state liberals
cite research involving convicted violent criminals in which the
offenders said they were beaten and/or abused as children. The
fact is, however, most violent offenders come from fatherless
households, where both women and children are much more likely to
be abused. Moreover, ample research shows that growing up in a
home where the biological father is absent is the single biggest
predictor of violent and criminal behavior, teen pregnancy, drug
use and academic failure.
It is also interesting to note that while over the years the
percentage of parents who use spanking as a form of discipline
has remained high at about 90 percent, juvenile violence,
particularly in schools, has been in decline since 1992.
According to the U.S. Justice Department, juvenile crime,
including violence and theft, declined substantially both in and
out of school between 1992 and 2001.
In addition, a report from the Youth Violence Project reported
that in 2003 the annual rate of serious violent crime was less
than half the rate in 1994.
Given the overwhelming evidence linking fatherless homes to
juvenile violence and crime, plus the fact that in many cases the
father is missing from the home because he is in prison, it is
hard to believe that anyone would advocate a policy that would
split up a family by putting a parent in prison for spanking.
On the other hand, it is appropriate to encourage parents to
be careful about the use of corporal punishment. It is never
fitting to physically injure a child or administer such
punishment as a way to vent anger. All punishment should be age
appropriate and it should always be for the benefit of the child.
And most importantly, parents should make certain their child
knows they are loved while balancing punishment with praise for
Gary Palmer is president of the Alabama Policy
Institute, a non-partisan, nonprofit research and education
Corpun file 18915
Los Angeles Times, 23 February 2007
Proposal to ban spanking is revised
Bill would outlaw specific punishments but is less
restrictive than previous plan.
By Nancy Vogel
Times Staff Writer
SACRAMENTO -- A Bay Area lawmaker retreated from her
proposed ban on spanking and instead offered a bill Thursday that
would criminalize parental discipline involving a closed fist,
belt, electrical cord, shoe or other objects.
Additionally, the legislation by Assemblywoman Sally Lieber
(D-Mountain View) would make it easier to prosecute anyone who
throws, kicks, burns, chokes or cuts a child younger than 18.
Also included would be striking a child younger than 3 in the
head or face, and vigorously shaking a baby or toddler.
Lieber triggered a heated national debate last month when she
said she wanted to make it illegal for anyone, including parents,
to strike a child younger than 4 years old. That proposal would
have covered even a swat on the rear and made offenses punishable
by up to a year in jail.
Lieber's proposal was ridiculed on television shows including
"Saturday Night Live" and "The Colbert
Report." Most of her colleagues in the 80-member Assembly,
Lieber said, told her they couldn't support a spanking ban.
"I personally am very passionate about banning all physical
abuse, but the votes are simply not there," she said.
"So California law will continue to allow parents,
caregivers -- whoever is in control of a child -- to
spank with an open hand on the buttocks, including to the point
of injury to the child."
Sixteen nations ban physical punishment of children. California
law prohibits the hitting of them in schools, day care centers
and foster care. It also makes it a crime to inflict
"unjustifiable" physical pain on a child. Lieber said
her legislation would eliminate some vagueness in that standard.
Her bill would change the law to say that certain acts --
such as hitting a child with a stick or paddle or slapping a
2-year-old in the face -- are presumed unjustifiable. Those
acts would be punishable as misdemeanor crimes with penalties of
up to a year in jail.
The bill also would allow prosecutors to seek felony charges
against those accused of shaking babies, and it would allow
judges to require violators to attend parenting classes.
California prosecutors have been trying to figure out
"exactly where abuse begins and appropriate corporal
punishment ends," said Thomas A. Nazario, a University of
San Francisco law professor who has advised Lieber.
The bill "will paint a fairly clear picture of where the
line is drawn -- what's appropriate and what's not,"
Other lawyers aren't so sure.
John E.B. Myers, a University of the Pacific law professor who
recently published a history of child protection laws, said
Lieber's bill would have little effect. If it were law, he said,
juries in child abuse cases could still conclude that parents
were using reasonable physical punishment even if they acted in
ways presumed unreasonable -- and therefore illegal -- by
At best, Lieber's measure "will send a message that if you
use a closed fist, you can get in serious trouble and you'll have
a tougher time defending yourself," said Myers, who supports
a ban on spanking. "It's a very small step, in my
Randy Thomasson, president of the nonprofit Campaign for Children
and Families, said Lieber's bill would rob parents of a
disciplinary tool -- mothers in particular, because they
often don't have a man's strength.
"There's too many moms who know if they spank their young
boys with a hand," Thomasson said, "it doesn't cause
the sting that they need to reform their behavior.
"How dare we say that our grandparents -- who had a
switch or even a shoe training them to respect authority and obey
the rules -- that they were abused," Thomasson said.
"You meet a lot of Americans who are glad they were spanked
because they needed it when they were little rebels."
No other state has laws as explicit as Lieber's measure, though
an Ohio senator this week introduced a bill to bar the spanking
of children younger than 3 years old.
Nadine A. Block, executive director of the nonprofit Center for
Effective Discipline in Columbus, Ohio, congratulated Lieber on
"hanging in there" despite heavy, sometimes personal,
She called the legislation "very reasonable as a first
"We would all like a perfect world … where we just
stopped hitting children," Block said. "In the
imperfect world, you sometimes have to do things
Robert Larzelere, a family science professor at Oklahoma State
University who has studied corporal punishment, said he agreed
with much of Lieber's legislation, especially the prohibition
against striking small children on the head.
Research has found that children who were struck in the face or
head showed a greater likelihood of behavioral problems later in
life, he said.
But he quibbled with forbidding the use of a paddle, stick or
other instrument to spank.
"The issue is not what a child is spanked with,"
Larzelere said, "but how hard they're spanked."
Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times
Follow-up: 1 June 2007 - Spanking bill rejected
Corpun file 19054
ksdk.com (KSDK-TV News Channel 5), St Louis, Missouri, 28 February 2007
Student Stripped, Spanked By Aunt In Classroom
By Jane Watrel
School officials in Prince George's County, Maryland are
investigating a relative's actions in a charter school last week.
The investigation came after a woman walked into the school
and spanked her nephew in front of his entire classroom.
"I asked him if something had happened and they said, 'Oh
you mean the whopping,'" says Paula Reitan. She couldn't
believe her ears after leaving a school party at Turning Point
Academy. Her daughter and three classmates told her how a fellow
second grader was stripped naked below the waist and spanked by a
relative in front of the entire class.
"The aunt came, made the child pull his pants down, pull his
underpants down and in front of the entire class, and
unfortunately my daughter had a full view of this, whipped him
with a belt," she says.
Horrified that the teacher was right in front of the classroom at
the time of the beating and the school's principal knew about the
incident, she fired off an email to a Prince George's County
School Board member only to be told Turning Point Academy is a
charter school. Prince George's County has no jurisdiction.
That didn't set well with the PhD Mom.
"I did some research and I really believe that the school
board does have the legal and moral obligation to investigate
this," she says.
In an about face, the school is now investigating. While Turning
Point Academy is attached to Trinity Assembly of God, the
teachers are paid by taxpayers.
"Certainly, if there is a reason to contact social services
regarding an adult's actions we would do that. If one of our
employees didn't act appropriately, then disciplinary action
would follow there as well."
No one at Turning Point Academy would comment about the spanking.
On Monday, its principal sent a letter home to parents saying,
"Please know that the incident is a family matter and should
not have occurred in a school setting. All interactions were
between the child and a family member."
RELATED VIDEO CLIP:
Local TV news version of the above story, same date (1 minute 40 seconds). Comments by the mother whose daughter saw the spanking, and by a spokesman for the school district.
HERE IS THE CLIP:
About this website
Country files: Domestic CP in America
Archive 2006: USA
Topics A to Z: Smacking and spanking