Corpun file 24635 at www.corpun.com
Daily Mail, London, 9 January 1929, p.7
Boy Who Smoked.
Bench & Deserved Punishment.
Click to enlarge
The headmaster and two assistant masters of Newport,
Shropshire, Grammar School who took part in the flogging of a
pupil for smoking were summoned by the boy's father, Mr. Ernest
J. Wright, at Newport yesterday for assault.
The masters were Mr. Walter Samuel Brooks, M.A., the headmaster,
and Messrs. William Harman and L.F. Lowe. The father of the boy,
Frank Douglas Wright, aged 16, is chairman of the Newport Urban
Council and a magistrate.
Mr. Gilbert Griffiths, for the boy, said that on December 6,
after school hours, Wright and Williams, another Grammar
schoolboy, were given a cigarette each by the operator at Mr.
Williams's cinema. Wright occasionally smoked at home and in the
street with his father's permission and did not know it was
against the school regulations to smoke out of school hours.
Williams and Wright walked along the street smoking. They were
met by a prefect named Bracey, and next day after prayers the
headmaster kept the senior school behind.
Fight with masters.
Mr. Brooks told Wright and Williams, "It has been
reported to me that you were seen smoking in the street yesterday
afternoon." Wright said "Yes, I was." Mr. Brooks
said, "It is against the school rules and I am going to make
an example of you and flog you."
Mr. Brooks told two assistant masters to hold the boy. He made a
fight for it and rushed to the library stairs. The two assistants
followed him and a struggle took place in which the boy was badly
He was taken back by force to the headmaster, put across a
sloping desk, and held by the head and feet by the two assistant
masters while he was flogged by Mr. Brooks with a cane. The
injuries on his legs and back were very severe, and his clothes
Mr. Brooks, in evidence, said he had addressed the boys on their
conduct in the school and the streets and their general behaviour
When told to receive the caning, Wright said "I
refuse," and rushed to the end of the room. He was brought
back struggling and kicking wildly with both legs, and was given
four strokes. He dived full length on to the floor and lay
The chairman of the magistrates, Mr. J. Clegg Hill, said that
the headmaster was quite within his rights in administering
corporal punishment. The boy Wright had been warned, but
deliberately broke the rule and led a younger boy astray.
Wright took up a defiant attitude amounting to insubordination.
The bruises and the tore coat were caused by the boy struggling
to escape the punishment due to him. The caning was properly
carried, out, and it would have been far better if Wright had
taken his punishment like a man.
All three summonses were dismissed and £5 5s. costs were allowed
the masters, Mr. Hill saying, "We consider the case ought
never to have been brought."
Follow-up: 24 April 1929 - Master's Right to Cane. Smoking Boy Case Again in Court.
About this website
Search this site
Illustrated article: Corporal punishment in UK schools
Other external links: UK school CP
CP Archive up to 1975: UK